http://www.spectropop.com ________________________________________________________________________ ______________ ______________ ______________ ______________ ______________ S P E C T R O P O P ______________ ______________ ______________ ________________________________________________________________________ The first name in Sound ------------------------------------------------------------------------ There are 6 messages in this issue of Spectropop. Topics in this Digest Number 87: 1. More Bad News From: Geri & John Clemente 2. Re:all bacharach all the time. From: alan zweig 3. The Lovely Aimi Macdonald? From: Lindsay 4. copyrights From: ELRONBEE 5. Re: More on artist rights and the Beach Boys From: Andrew Hickey 6. Re: BBs liner notes From: Dmirich ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 1 Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 23:55:50 -0500 From: Geri & John Clemente Subject: More Bad News I' don't think I like this week at all. I received word today that another of the artists who contributed to "Girl Groups" has passed away. Laura Webb Childress, one of the original Bobbettes, passed away on January 8th, of complications from colon cancer. She was 57. Laura and her school friends, Reather Dixon, Helen Gathers and sisters Emma and Jannie Pought made Rock & Roll history in 1957 when they sang a song they made up about a teacher in their school named "Mr. Lee", which netted them a contract with Atlantic Records while they were in elementary school and junior high school. The Bobbettes never repeated the success of "Mr. Lee" although they had several mild hits during the early 1960s and continued recording into the 80s, sometimes under the tutelage of Laura's brother Joe. Laura was instrumental in setting up my interview with The Bobbettes in 1998. The Bobbettes were known for their stage antics as well as their superb singing and songwriting skills. Always a bright and upbeat person, Laura will be missed by her fans and friends. John Clemente --------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------- Message: 2 Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 05:40:35 -0500 From: alan zweig Subject: Re:all bacharach all the time. "Tobias Bernsand" wrote: >*Sunset Festival Orchestra: Non-Stop Bacharach 1971 > >*Tony Dillon Orchestra and Singers: The Greatest Hit >Songs of Burt Bacharach > >.There's nothing wrong with >the arrangements or vocals, but it's kind of boring that >the million Bacharach covers LPs found at every record >fair feature the same songs... Not that you can just go out and look for it but if you want a Bacharach cover LP with some of his less familiar material, keep an eye out for Terry Baxter's double (or triple?) record set. He does stuff like Loneliness Remembers.., Don't make me over, Walk little Dolly, Here where there is love, Go with love, Try to see it my way... And he does my favourite off-the-beaten path Bacharach song, namely Nikki. Ed Ames also does Nikki on HIS all-Bacharach record. I know there are a bunch of those non-stop records. I had the Carole King one and I found it way above your average instrumental record (and this is one area where I consider myself an accidental expert.) AZ --------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------- Message: 3 Date: 10 Jan 2001 01:36:28 -0800 From: Lindsay Subject: The Lovely Aimi Macdonald? "Tobias Bernsand" wrote: > Some LPs I've picked up over the latest couple of months > *Aimi MacDonald and Ronnie Carroll: Promises, Promises > 1969 Would that be "The Lovely Aimi Macdonald" of "At Last the 1948 Show"? It was a pre-Python Pythonesque comedy program (1967) whose cast included two of the Pythons, Cleese & Chapman. First time I ever saw "Monty Python" I said, "Hey, great! This is just like 'The 1948 Show!'" Tobias's message sent me back to a 1948 Show page (www.pythonet.org/1948show/) where I followed the link to Aimi's biography. Not surprising at all, it turns out, that she would be recording "Promises, Promises". (She's at www.internet-ireland.ie/power/actor/details/aimimcd.htm) Lindsay --------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------- Message: 4 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 01:32:36 EST From: ELRONBEE Subject: copyrights In a message dated 1/9/01 5:07:28 AM, spectropop writes: > > The second is that these recordings will *not* be > > 'indefinitely unavailable' - international copyright > > law as it currently stands means that the copyright to > > a recording only lasts 50 years - Elvis' recordings > > will start going out of copyright in 2004, the Beach > > Boys' in 2011, the Beatles' in 2012, and so on, > > hmmm...if this is true, how is it that MCA (Decca) > still owns Bing Crosbys "White Christmas", which was > issued in 1942? It would seem that the copyright would > have expired in 1992. Perhaps copyrights are > renewable under some cirumstances? I thought the copyright law for Europe was 50 years and the law for the US was 99 years. No? --------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------- Message: 5 Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 00:06:16 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Hickey Subject: Re: More on artist rights and the Beach Boys > I think we are on the same page here, and > thank you for your informed and considered comments Thanks. I agree, we do seem to be on the same page... > For some > reason, we tend to think recording artists should > have some intangible right to their performances, > yet we don't believe the same of an actor in a film. The actor wouldn't count as the 'artist' in the same way - perhaps the director would... and indeed it is usually expected that a director have a certain level of control over his/her work. > just as a group must protect ownership of their > intellectual property, the owner of the recordings > must likewise protect its right to market their > recordings. The idealistic concept that artists > should have rights over their work simply doesn't > factor in this practical necessity. Absolutely. However, I believe that the artists should still have rights over how their work is used, and that the rights of the artists to the work are more important than those of the record company... > If an artist pays for and makes their own recordings, > they certainly should have the rights over their > material, and in fact they do. They always have. Not quite... most artists are given an advance, which is a loan, usually (not always) paid back at interest, but always intended to be paid back, by the record company. They are then, out of that, expected to pay for the recordings. It's roughly equivalent to getting a mortgage, and finding that after you've paid it off 'your' house belongs to the bank... > Is that not what Dave Clark, Apple, Brother, Bizarre > etc. did? All within *very* narrow limits...most (even Bizarre) were merely imprints controlled by majors. A quote >from Mike Love - "We said "Well, the only way you're going to be a record company is if you have your own distribution, sales and promotion. Just making a royalty deal with a major record company to distribute a product is nothing more than a distribution deal for your production company, so you really have no mastery over your own destiny. We saw that immediately after we'd signed it, so we said "Oh shit, we've had it!"" > Isn't that what the Stealth Munchkins is about? Yeah, except so far there seems to be a singular lack of massive chart success and financial gain... > So yes, it would be ideal if artists always owned > their own work, though I'm not convinced it's practical. I'm perfectly convinced it's practical. The standard artist contract could be identical to how it is now, except that all rights revert to the artist when the advance has been recouped, with the caveat that the artist has to agree to licence the work to the label for a minimum period after reversion... > Just maybe that artist deal is worth considering > after all. It must be. After all, artists still sign > 'em even today - AND with the advice of experienced > attorneys. That's because unfortunately the labels are bargaining >from a position of strength, the artists from one of weakness (although the person who doesn't write, arrange etc wouldn't fit into my definition of 'artist'...). If I had the option, I would sign one of those contracts - because the rights I'd be signing away are actually financially worth less than nothing to me at the moment (we haven't yet gone into profit on our first album...). If, on the other hand, I were actually in a position to get my music heard and bought by a reasonable number of people, then I wouldn't consider it for half a second... > it's encouraging to fans like me to see dot-com > ventures by the self-contained indies doing well. And me too - but Deck and Surf's Up, unlike the other examples, aren't (or allegedly are not) compensating the artists whose work they are selling... > So there may be a sub-market of stuff mastered from > PD analog copies while the majors continue marketing new, > copyrighted, enhanced versions. That was my point - it would be in the *interests* of the Beach Boys, once ownership was established, to put these recordings out in the best possible format. > Isn't that what we all expect the currently disputed > Hite Morgan set to be? But you're right about Mikey's > interests - that's what the suit is all about. Which is why I think the only question should be whether the surviving band members or Hite Morgan should receive the royalties. The set will be simillar whoever puts it out, under whatever imprint. >As I said I believe we are on the same page here, and >regardless of any differing opinions, your comments >are most appreciated, Andrew. And the same for yours as well. ===== Subliminal message: Buy the new Stealth Munchkin album - http://www.geocities.com/stealth_munchkin --------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------- Message: 6 Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 08:26:07 EST From: Dmirich Subject: Re: BBs liner notes Someone wrote: >In fact, [if the BBs regain control of this music], this >would make it very much in Mike Love's interests...to >allow a well-annotated, well packaged issue of these >recordings in the best possible quality. Jaime responded: > Isn't that what we all expect the currently disputed Hite > Morgan set to be? But you're right about Mikey's interests > - that's what the suit is all about. The ironic thing is, > if they were to somehow get the rights and release it > themselves, guess who would be hired to do the liner > notes!!! I don't think it would be Brad Elliot, who Capitol and the BBs will no longer employ for liner note writing (look at the notes from the new 2fers). Besides, Mike Love would have good reason to not want Brad's participation in any future projects because of the strong stance against him that Brad has taken over the years in discussions on the various BB mailing lists and newsgroups. Dave Mirich --------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------- End
Spectropop text contents & copy; copyright Spectropop unless stated otherwise. All rights in and to the contents of these documents, including each element embodied therein, is subject to copyright protection under international copyright law. Any use, reuse, reproduction and/or adaptation without written permission of the owners is a violation of copyright law and is strictly prohibited. All rights reserved.